Windlass Hero's Warsword « Thread Started on Jul 17, 2010, 12:28pm »
I admit that this one intrigues me. I am rather fond of large swords and this one is quite large. I'm familiar with the whippy reputation of Windlass' larger swords but I already have a couple of their two handed offerings and find this reputation to be, perhaps, a bit unearned.
Has anyone any experience with this particular sword? I would love to hear opinions!
Looks like a rough rendition of the war-sword attributed to Robert the Bruce.
Shot at 2010-08-18
I looked at this one when she first was released to market. Coll looking greatsword. Once the size stats clicked in to my head, I decided against it. It about 3 inches longer than my Wallace claymore, and she's a beast. One massive chopper is good enough for me. Here is a snapshot of me with my Wallace, and I'm 6'2", 280lbs. I cant imagine adding 3 more inches to that.
Perhaps I'm old and tired, but I think that the chances of finding out what's actually going on are so absurdly remote that the only thing to do is to say, "Hang the sense of it," and keep yourself busy. - Slartibartfast, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.
"If you want to make enemies, try to change something". Wilson, Woodrow T
By the way, Margshus, thanks for the photo. That really puts the size of the beast into perspective! I'm an inch shorter and about 20 pounds heavier than you with a similar build, so I think the lovely monster might suit me.
That has to be some sort of blunder on the forge's behalf. Windlass is far from the best manufacturer, even in our price range, but I couldn't really see them intentionally releasing something with a tang like that. I looked on SFI and didn't see the thread, I'd love to hear more info about this....
BLECHH! Welded rat tail! Hope they're not all like that. Imagen that..an entire run of huge heavy two handers, all with welded tangs. I hope thats not the case. Hopefully it's just one. It would be interesting to see if others have this little surprise hidden under the grip.
I would assume( yeah I know) that with their market presence they would know better than to do something like that on purpose and then advertise it as "Battle Ready". Perhaps the forge did a little juke job on them, and there will be a re release in the future?
The only one that I have seen pics of with the welded rat tail is the Pavia, no pics of the others have surfaced yet to see if that construction method is common throughout the line of new two handers.
Steven, The Sword of Pavia, is not a rat tail tang, it is a tang extension. Not the best method by any means, but no where near as bad as a true rat tail. This method of construction can actually be quite durable and is pretty common in long handled functional swords because the weld is far removed from the stress point at the blade shoulders. There is a post about this on Sword Forum, which I assume you have seen? The poster even admits to "abusing" the sword by hitting a log with it as hard as he could. The fact that the sword actually survived this speaks to the validity of the construction method. Personally, I would have preferred the natural tang to extend further, but I guess Windlass disagrees. I have not disassembled the Hero's Warsword, but I'd assume a similar construction. The result is a decent sword suitable for light cutting, but I would not try and "torture test" it unless you want it to break. Actually that goes for any sword. It is always possible that there were some scratches on the sword when it was photographed, it could also be the lighting. In any case, you will not receive the exact sword pictured. As they are hand made each one is a little different. I hope this helps.
Oh yeah I gathered it stood up to the abuse, once, twice, fifteen times ....... but the sixteenth ......... snap ........ I imagine this weld is a result of the forging being done and its all but finished and a mistake happens. Okay, no big deal, can understand one doesnt want a perfectly good blade to go to waste. Its just if it was a sword YOU REALLY LOVED, and wanted it long term and use it often the mileage would be limited before it broke and blades breaking are dangerous affairs.
But hey I guess its why windlass have sword sales and not moat blade sales.
Perhaps I'm old and tired, but I think that the chances of finding out what's actually going on are so absurdly remote that the only thing to do is to say, "Hang the sense of it," and keep yourself busy. - Slartibartfast, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.
"If you want to make enemies, try to change something". Wilson, Woodrow T
The key here is that it is forge welded together. If it beaks at the weld, you take/ send it to a smith who knows what he is doing, and he can forge weld it back together for you. If he is good, it will be as strong as it was before.
It is completely historical (look at the tiny tangs on authentic viking swords some time, if you want to see a terrifyingly small tang on a sword meant for ABUSE), and not a flaw or problem. And if it becomes a problem, it is one that is easily fixable.
Eh... I know I wouldn't want a sword that size with a tang that size. I'm not aware of any terrifyingly small tangs on historic viking swords, either, but it also goes without saying that a smaller sword can get by with a smaller tang (as evidenced by Bill Tsafa's tire pell tests on the main website).
The sky is still midnight, the grass is still green And many great things are that never have been The voice of the earth sings the song of the King And God watches down upon everything
The key here is that it is forge welded together. If it beaks at the weld, you take/ send it to a smith who knows what he is doing, and he can forge weld it back together for you. If he is good, it will be as strong as it was before.
It is completely historical (look at the tiny tangs on authentic viking swords some time, if you want to see a terrifyingly small tang on a sword meant for ABUSE), and not a flaw or problem. And if it becomes a problem, it is one that is easily fixable.
That joint does not look to be forge welded to me, it bears the signs of being MIG welded and then ground to fit the I.D. of the grip. If you look at the rat tail in the bottom pic, immediately above the juncture with the tang on the top side, there is clearly the toe of a fillet weld visible. That tang extension was electrically welded on.
If done properly, it is a legitimate construction method. The key word being IF. I would trust it more if I had done it myself, and had TIG welded it to the tang properly.
« Last Edit: Jul 20, 2010, 10:36pm by chuckinohio »
Forum Content & Posts Copyright � 2007 by Sword Buyers Guide
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed by the members of this forum are solely those of the commenting forum members. The Sword Buyers Guide (SBG) does not necessarily support the statements made by forum members, and administrators reserve the right to edit or delete offensive or offending statements. Staff of the SBG are committed to responsible sword ownership and use, and under no circumstances condone the use of a sword on another living being or any unsafe practices with live blades. The destructive tests shown on the SBG main page are done under controlled conditions and should never be replicated. The SBG is not responsible for any illegal use, unsafe practice, or use causing bodily harm performed by forum members or guests involving swords.